[Originally posted at The Daily Reckoning, Sunday, December 18th, 2011]
The latest data show that book sales are way up this season. So much for the prediction that books will be killed by technology. On the contrary, technology has enabled the great literature of the ages and the present to be put in the hands of everyone. I canâ€™t think of a better time to begin refurbishing Laissez-Faire Books (founded in 1972), because it is the market that laissez-faire celebrates that has made all the literature we love more accessible than ever.
Addison Wiggin, president of Agora Financial, and I were discussing the various challenges ahead of us as we infuse new life into an old and venerable institution. He drew my attention to a point that Iâ€™ve overlooked. Most people donâ€™t know the term â€œlaissez-faire.â€ They donâ€™t know how to say it (that very day, I was introduced for a speech, and the host mispronounced it) and they donâ€™t know what it means. Once in common circulation, this term has not been in common use, even in libertarian circles. So we have some work to do, in helping people even understand the name of the bookstore at lfb.org.
The pronunciation in English is lay-say-fair. Its French origins date back to the late Renaissance. As the story goes, it was first used about the year 1680, a time when the nation-state was on the rise throughout Europe. The French finance minister, Jean-Baptiste Colbert, asked a merchant named M. Le Gendre what the state could do to promote industry.
According to legend, the reply came: â€œLaissez-nous faire,â€ or â€œlet it be.â€ This incident was reported in 1751 in the Journal Oeconomique by the free-trade champion Rene de Voyer, Marquis dâ€™Argenson. The slogan was codified finally in the words of Vincent de Gournay: â€œLaissez-faire et laissez-passer, le monde va de lui mÃªme!â€ The loose translation: â€œLet it be and let goods pass; the world goes by itself.â€
Weâ€™ve rendered this in the form you see on our masthead: Leave the world alone, it manages itself. You could shorten it: Let it be.
All these renderings express not only the idea of free trade â€” a main subject of dispute in 18th-century European politics â€” but also a larger and more-beautiful vision of the way society can be permitted to work.
This idea can be summed up in the phrase â€œlaissez-faire,â€ or in the doctrine of what was once called simply liberalism, which today is clarified as classical liberalism. This idea is this: Society contains within itself the capacity for ordering and managing its own path of development. It follows that people should enjoy the liberty to manage their own lives, associate as they please, exchange with anyone and everyone, own and accumulate property and otherwise be unencumbered by state expansion into their lives.
In the centuries that have followed, millions of great thinkers and writers have elaborated on this core idea within all disciplines of the social science. Then as now, there stand two broad schools of thought: those who believe in state control of one or many aspects of the social order and those who believe that such attempts at control are counterproductive to the cause of prosperity, justice, peace and the building of the civilized life.
These two ways of thinking are different from what is called the right and the left today. The left is inclined to think that if we let the economic sphere be free, the world will collapse, which advances some theory of the disaster that would befall us all without government control. The right is similarly convinced that the state is necessary lest the world collapse into violent, warring, culture-destroying gangs.
The laissez-faire view rejects both views in favor of what Claude FrÃ©dÃ©ric Bastiat called â€œthe harmony of interestsâ€ that make up the social order. It is the view that the artists, merchants, philanthropists, entrepreneurs and property owners â€” and not the cartelizing thugs of the state â€” ought to be permitted to drive the course of history.
This view is now held by millions of thinkers around the world. It is the most exciting intellectual movement today, and in places where we might least expect to find it. There are institutions in every country devoted to the idea. Blogs and forums are everywhere dedicated to the conviction. Books are pouring out by the week and the day. The revolt against the state is growing.
The growth of the idea of laissez-faire in our times is infused by a digital energy. But the idea itself is not new in world history. Though it is mostly associated with 18th-century British thought, it is a view of society that has much-deeper roots in the Christian Middle Ages and early Jewish thought. Nor is laissez-faire somehow a Western idea alone. The deepest roots of laissez-faire actually trace to ancient China, and even today, the thoughts of the masters offer a fine summary.
Here are some examples:
Lao Tzu (6th century B.C.): â€œThe more artificial taboos and restrictions there are in the world, the more the people are impoverishedâ€¦The more that laws and regulations are given prominence, the more thieves and robbers there will beâ€¦â€
â€œThe Sage says: â€˜I take no action, yet the people transform themselves, I favor quiescence and the people right themselves, I take no action and the people enrich themselvesâ€¦â€™â€
Chuang Tzu (369-286 B.C.): â€œI would rather roam and idle about in a muddy ditch, at my own amusement, than to be put under the restraints that the ruler would impose. I would never take any official service, and thereby I will [be free] to satisfy my own purposes.â€
â€œThere has been such thing as letting mankind alone; there has never been such a thing as governing mankind [with success].â€ The world â€œdoes simply not need governing; in fact, it should not be governed.â€
Pao Ching-yen (4th century A.D.): â€œWhere knights and hosts could not be assembled, there was no warfare afieldâ€¦Ideas of using power for advantage had not yet burgeoned. Disaster and disorder did not occurâ€¦People munched their food and disported themselves; they were carefree and contented.â€
Ssu-ma Châ€™ien (145-90 B.C.): â€œEach man has only to be left to utilize his own abilities and exert his strength to obtain what he wishesâ€¦When each person works away at his own occupation and delights in his own business, then like water flowing downward, goods will naturally flow ceaseless day and night without being summoned, and the people will produce commodities without having been asked.â€
These early beginnings of the idea began here but can be traced through thinkers of ancient Greece and Rome and through the Middle Ages, until the notion swept the world in the 18th and 19th centuries, giving rise to unheard-of prosperity, liberty and peace for all. In the 18th century and in large parts of the world (other than the English-speaking world), laissez-faire has been called liberalism or classical liberalism, a doctrine of social organization that can be summed up in the words of Lord Acton: Liberty is the highest political end of humankind.
To be sure, the notion of liberalism was already corrupted early in the 20th century. As Ludwig von Mises wrote in his book Liberalism (1929), â€œThe world today wants to hear no more of liberalism. Outside England, the term â€˜liberalismâ€™ is frankly proscribed. In England, there are, to be sure, still â€˜liberals,â€™ but most of them are so in name only. In fact, they are rather moderate socialists. Everywhere today, political power is in the hands of the anti-liberal parties.â€
That remains true today. And the revolt against this is often termed â€œlibertarian,â€ a word that has long been associated with a primary concern for human liberty. In current understanding, it refers to a tightening and radicalizing of the old liberal view. It asserts the inviolability of property rights, the primacy of peace in world affairs and the centrality of free association and trade in the conduct of human affairs. It differs from the old liberal view in dispensing the naive view that the state can be limited by law and constitutions; it imagines the possibility that society can manage itself without a state, defined as the one institution in society that is permitted the legal right of aggression against person and property. Libertarians are consistently against war, protectionism, taxation, inflation and any laws that interfere with the right of free association.
Libertarianism came of age in the early 1970s with the writings of Murray Rothbard and, later, with the founding of Laissez-Faire Books and the work of Robert Nozick and Tibor Machan. Libertarians are not necessarily anarchists or anarcho-capitalists, but the main strain of thinking in the libertarian world today revolves around the idea of statelessness as an intellectual benchmark. This view is not utopian or far-flung; it is only the hope for an ideal in which theft, murder, kidnapping and counterfeiting are not legally sanctioned by the state.
Nor is such a society historically unprecedented. Rothbard wrote about Colonial America as an example of a wildly successful experiment of society without a central state. Medieval Europe made the first great economic revolution without recourse to the power of the nation-state. David Friedman has documented anarchism and competitive legal orders in medieval Iceland. Other writers go so far as to say that given how we conduct our lives day to day, relying on the productivity of private institutions and associations, we never really leave anarchy.
As Mises says, liberalism/libertarianism/laissez-faire is not a completed doctrine. There are so many areas remaining to be explored and so many applications to make both in history and in our time. The most-exciting books of our time are being written from the vantage point of human liberty. The state is on the march, but the resistance is growing.
It is my great honor to be involved in the Agora effort to revive Laissez-Faire Books as the international distribution and publishing house for the greatest ideas of our time. It is a debilitating thing to watch the state on the march, but it is a source of joy to know that ideas are more powerful than all the armies of the world. Reason, literacy and relentless work for what is right and true will eventually lead the idea of laissez-faire to victory.